Infrastructure as Code (IaC) has moved from best practice to table stakes. Every serious engineering team now provisions, configures, and manages infrastructure through version-controlled code rather than manual portal clicks. But the tooling landscape has fragmented - and choosing the right tool matters. This guide compares the two leading options: HashiCorp Terraform and Microsoft Bicep.
The IaC Workflow
GitOps-driven infrastructure deployment pipeline
Write Code
HCL / Bicep
HCL / Bicep
→
Plan / Preview
Diff Changes
Diff Changes
→
Review & Approve
PR / Gate
PR / Gate
→
Apply / Deploy
Provision
Provision
Head-to-Head Comparison
🌎
Terraform (HCL)
- 🟢 Multi-cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP, +1000 providers)
- 🟢 Mature ecosystem & huge community
- 🟢 State management with remote backends
- 🟢 Terraform Cloud for team collaboration
- 🟡 BSL licence (no longer fully open-source)
- 🔴 State file management complexity
💫
Bicep (Azure)
- 🟢 First-class Azure support
- 🟢 No state file - uses ARM directly
- 🟢 Cleaner syntax than ARM JSON
- 🟢 Free, open-source, Microsoft-backed
- 🟡 Azure-only (no multi-cloud)
- 🔴 Smaller community & module registry
When to Choose Terraform
- You operate across multiple cloud providers (AWS + Azure, or GCP + Azure)
- You need to manage non-cloud resources (DNS, monitoring, Kubernetes, GitHub repos)
- Your team already has Terraform expertise and established modules
- You want a unified language for all infrastructure, regardless of provider
When to Choose Bicep
- You're an Azure-only or Azure-first organisation
- You want zero state management overhead - Bicep deploys are stateless
- You need day-zero support for new Azure features (Bicep gets them immediately)
- Your team is migrating from ARM templates and needs a cleaner syntax
Example: Deploying an Azure Web App
Terraform
resource "azurerm_resource_group" "main" {
name = "rg-webapp-prod"
location = "UK South"
}
resource "azurerm_service_plan" "main" {
name = "plan-webapp-prod"
resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.main.name
location = azurerm_resource_group.main.location
os_type = "Linux"
sku_name = "P1v3"
}
resource "azurerm_linux_web_app" "main" {
name = "app-hibba-prod"
resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.main.name
location = azurerm_resource_group.main.location
service_plan_id = azurerm_service_plan.main.id
site_config {
application_stack {
node_version = "20-lts"
}
}
}
Bicep
param location string = 'uksouth'
resource rg 'Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups@2023-07-01' = {
name: 'rg-webapp-prod'
location: location
}
resource plan 'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms@2023-01-01' = {
name: 'plan-webapp-prod'
location: location
sku: { name: 'P1v3', tier: 'PremiumV3' }
kind: 'linux'
properties: { reserved: true }
}
resource app 'Microsoft.Web/sites@2023-01-01' = {
name: 'app-hibba-prod'
location: location
properties: {
serverFarmId: plan.id
siteConfig: {
linuxFxVersion: 'NODE|20-lts'
}
}
}
Our Recommendation
Azure-Only?
Use Bicep
Use Bicep
Multi-Cloud?
Use Terraform
Use Terraform
Both Clouds?
Terraform + Bicep modules
Terraform + Bicep modules
"The best IaC tool is the one your team will actually use consistently. Perfect tooling with no adoption is worse than good tooling with full adoption."
Need help choosing your IaC strategy?
Our cloud architects have deployed hundreds of environments with both Terraform and Bicep.
Book a Consultation